Coal scam one of country's biggest scam, says CBI while seeking maximum punishment for convicted persons
Aug 04, 2022
New Delhi [India], August 4 : The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday said the coal scam is one of the biggest scams in the country and the impact of this scam is that companies are not coming forward to mine the coal blocks and despite ample coal provided by the mother Earth, we are not able to extract coal and consequently there is a shortage of coal. We are compelled to import coal from outside India like Indonesia, Australia etc.
The submissions of CBI come during the arguments on the point of sentence in relation to a case relates to the allocation of the Lohara East Coal block in Maharashtra.
The court on last date had convicted former Coal Secretary HC Gupta, former Joint Secretary, KS Kropha, Nagpur based firm Grace Industries Limited and its director Mukesh Gupta after finding irregularities in the allocation of a coal block in Maharashtra.
On Thursday, Sanjay Kumar Deputy Legal Advisor CBI requested the Court to award seven years imprisonment punishment to H C Gupta, K S Kropha and Mukesh Gupta. It was also prayed that the punishment so awarded may be ordered to run consecutively.
CBI during arguments submitted that loss to the tune of Rupees 1.86 Lakh Crore to the Govt. Exchequer.(CAG Report) and due to this scam Supreme Court had to cancelled allocation of 214 Coal Blocks.
The Court of a special judge Arun Bhardwaj had convicted HC Gupta and others under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Court has fixed the date of 08.08.2022 for pronouncement of order on sentence.
Earlier, the CBI had registered a case in the matter on September 20, 2012 under section - 120B r/w 420 IPC r/w 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. On completion of the investigation, a chargesheet was filed by the CBI against Grace Industries Limited and Mukesh Gupta, director of the company in the court on October 28, 2014.
The special judge while discussing the role of public servants at the Centre and the state ordered further investigation into the matter with a direction that the evidence collected during further investigation, may be placed before the competent authority for the consideration of providing sanction to prosecute public servants namely KS Kropha, the then Joint Secretary, Ministry of Coal and VS Sawakhande, the then Director, Directorate of Geology and Mining, Nagpur, Government of Maharashtra under section - 19 of the P.C. Act, 1988.
The Court on August 10, 2015, took cognizance of the offences punishable under section - 120B r/w 409/420 IPC r/w 13(2) r/w 13(1)(c) and (d) of the PC Act, 1988 and substantive offences. Accordingly, summons were issued to the accused persons for their appearance before the Court. During the course of trial, a total of 34 witnesses had been examined by the prosecution/CBI to prove its case.
According to the CBI, allegations against the convicts M/s Grace Industries Ltd. and Mukesh Gupta during the period between the year 2005 to 2011 at New Delhi, Maharashtra and other places, in furtherance of the common object of the criminal conspiracy hatched with other co-accused persons i.e. HC Gupta, KS Kropha and cheated by Ministry of Coal, Government of India by dishonestly and fraudulently inducing the Ministry of Coal to allocate "Lohara East Coal Block" situated in the state of Maharashtra in favour of M/s GIL on the basis of false information about net worth, capacity, equipments and status of procurement and installation of the plant.
CBI also stated that the said, company in its application claimed its net worth as Rs.120 Crores whereas its own networth was Rs 3.3 crores only company falsified its existing capacity as 1,20,000 Third Party Administrator (TPA) against 30,000 TPA.
In a order dated August 25, 2014 the Supreme Court of India had cancelled the entire allocations of Coal Blocks. Vide order dated: January 19, 2015, Special Judge of the trial court had observed that the working of the officers of the Prime Minister's office also does not appear to be above Board.