SC directs Enforcement Directorate to present ECIR in Chhattisgarh liquor irregularities case

New Delhi [India], January 8 : The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Enforcement Directorate to place an ECIR (Enforcement Case Information Report) and a copy of the FIR on the basis of which the central probe agency has lodged a complaint in the Chhattisgarh liquor irregularities case.
A bench of justices, Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan passed the direction.
"We direct the Enforcement Directorate to produce before the court a copy of the ECIR referred to in the prayer clause A and a copy of the FIR on the basis of which the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) has been registered," the court said giving ED two weeks to place the documents.
The court has listed the matter for a hearing on February 15.
Earlier this October, the court asked the Enforcement Directorate to hold their hand for the time being in a money laundering matter related to the Chhattisgarh liquor irregularities case. The oral remark was passed by the apex court while dealing with various pleas relating to the Chhattisgarh liquor irregularities case.
The top court directed ED not to take coercive steps against the petitioners, including Anil and Yash Tuteja, in the money laundering matter related to the Chhattisgarh liquor irregularities case and also remarked that the probe agency must stay their hands in all manners.
In the earlier hearing, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegation is about offences under the Income Tax Act so far as the predicated offence is concerned and cognizance has not been taken by the competent court.
One plea was filed by IAS Anil Tuteja and his son Yash Tuteja through advocate-on-record Malk Manish Bhat.
Yash Tuteja has challenged the vires of Section 50 and Section 63 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 ("PMLA") and said that the challenge is primarily based upon the premise that the provisions of the PMLA, which allow officers of the Directorate of Enforcement to summon any person to record his statement under Section 50 of the PMLA and require that person to speak the truth in such statements, are violative of Articles 20(3) and 21 of the Constitution of India.
The petition has sought to quash the summons issued to Anil Tuteja under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, by the ED.
Another plea was filed by Karishma and Anwar Dhebar through advocate Malak Manish Bhatt. One of the petitioners, Siddharth Singhania, has approached the court through advocate Aljo K Joseph.
ED is conducting an investigation into the liquor scam, which ran from 2019 to 2022 and in which corruption was done in multiple ways. The bribe was collected from the distillers per case of liquor procured from them by the CSMCL, they said.
The ED investigation has revealed that Arun Pati Tripathi, through his direct actions at the insistence of Anwar Dhebar, corrupted the entire liquor system of Chhattisgarh to maximise corruption in the department. He made policy changes in conspiracy with his other colleagues and gave tenders to associates of Anwar Dhebar so that maximum benefits could be taken.
Despite being a senior ITS officer and MD of CSMCL, he went against the ethos of the functioning of any state excise department and used state-run shops to sell unaccounted kacha liquor, ED has alleged.
ED alleged that his complicit actions resulted in massive losses to the State Exchequer and filled the pockets of the beneficiaries of the Liquor Syndicate with more than Rs 2000 crore in illegal proceeds of crime. He also received a substantial share of this loot.
Thus, the very objective of CSMCL--to increase the state's revenue and provide quality-controlled liquor to citizens--was violated by him for his personal illegal gains, read the official statement.
ED has conducted consequential search operations at locations in Raipur, Bhilai and Mumbai, and the searches have resulted in the discovery of 53 acres of land in Naya Raipur with a book value of Rs 21.60 crore acquired by Anwar Dhebar by using proceeds of crime in the name of a JV.
This property was purchased through a maze of transactions in the name of an associate by routing proceeds of crime acquired from the FL-10A licensee. During recent search proceedings, ED has seized cash worth Rs 20 lakh and multiple incriminating documents, according to the official statement.
In searches in Mumbai, unaccounted investments worth around Rs 1 crore with a share trading firm in the name of Arvind Singh and Pinki Singh wife of Arvind Singh were found and the same have been frozen under PMLA.
Earlier, ED had frozen fixed deposits worth Rs 27.5 crore from Trilok Singh Dhillon. Earlier, ED had seized jewellery worth Rs 28 crore from the house of a country liquor Distiller.